SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

Aegis Electronic Group OFAC Settlement: $20K (2011)

Last updated:

Aegis Electronic Group, Inc., a U.S. distributor of industrial imaging products, including cameras, monitors, and related control units, settled apparent violations of the Iranian Transactions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 560, by agreeing to pay $20,000. OFAC alleged that Aegis violated the Iranian Transactions Regulations by its unlicensed sale and export of camera control units to Austria with knowledge that the items were intended for re-export to Iran.

Penalty Amount

$20,000.00

Enforcement Date

April 7, 2011

Rank in Top Penalties

#419

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
Aegis Electronic Group, Inc.
Country:
🇺🇸 United States
Industry:
Hardware & Electronics
Address:
Gilbert, AZ
Penalty amount:
$20,000.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$10,000.00
Egregious case:
Unknown
Voluntary self disclosure:
No
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
August 2008 to January 2009
Program:
Iranian Transactions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 560
Enforcement date:
April 7, 2011

Nature of the Apparent Violations

Aegis, a U.S. distributor of industrial imaging products including cameras, monitors, and related control units, violated the Iranian Transactions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 560 (ITR), by its unlicensed sale and export of camera control units to Austria with knowledge that the items were intended for re-export to Iran. During August 2008 through January 2009, Aegis exported two camera control units from the United States to Austria for re-export to Iran. The total transaction value of the exported camera control units was $2,685. Aegis did not voluntarily disclose this matter to OFAC.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

Aegis did not voluntarily disclose the apparent violations to OFAC. The base penalty amount was $10,000, the Applicable Schedule Amount established by OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 74 Fed. Reg. 57,593 (Nov. 9, 2009). OFAC adjusted the base amount upward to $20,000 to reflect applicable General Factors, including that the criminal charges set forth in the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reflect knowing and willful conduct by an employee attributable to the company, that there is no indication Aegis' senior management participated in the apparent violations, and that Aegis lacked a sanctions compliance program at the time of the apparent violations but has since implemented one.

The OFAC settlement is related to a Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached by Aegis and the Office of the United States Attorney for the District of Delaware. The criminal investigation was initiated by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Office of Investigations in Philadelphia, PA. The criminal charges set forth in the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reflect knowing and willful conduct by an employee that is attributable to the company.

Compliance Takeaways

Aegis lacked a sanctions compliance program at the time of the apparent violations. Following the enforcement action, it implemented a compliance program requiring sanctions and export compliance training of all employees. OFAC noted that the knowing and willful conduct of an employee was attributable to the company, and that there was no indication Aegis' senior management participated in the apparent violations.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: a53feb2542b8500864dfd7f589b72056e77616747b1c08509aa07a00321939dc

More OFAC Cases