SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

COSL Singapore Ltd OFAC Settlement: $415.4K (2017)

Last updated:

COSL Singapore Ltd, an oilfield services company and subsidiary of China Oilfield Service Limited, settled its potential civil liability for 55 apparent violations of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 560, agreeing to pay $415,350. The apparent violations involved the export and re-export of oil rig supplies to four oil rigs located in Iranian territorial waters between October 2011 and February 2013.

Penalty Amount

$415,350.00

Enforcement Date

August 24, 2017

Rank in Top Penalties

#153

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
COSL Singapore Ltd
Country:
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ Singapore
Industry:
Energy Services
Address:
Singapore
Penalty amount:
$415,350.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$923,000.00
Max civil monetary penalty:
$13,750,000.00
Egregious case:
No
Apparent violations:
55
Voluntary self disclosure:
No
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
October 7, 2011 to February 20, 2013
Program:
Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 560 (ITSR)
Enforcement date:
August 24, 2017

Nature of the Apparent Violations

The 55 apparent violations of Β§Β§ 560.203 and 560.204 of the ITSR occurred between the approximate dates of October 7, 2011 and February 20, 2013. Through its subsidiary companies COSL Drilling Pan-Pacific (Labuan) Ltd and COSL Drilling Pan-Pacific Ltd, COSL Singapore exported or attempted to export 55 orders of oil rig supplies from the United States to Singapore and the United Arab Emirates, and then re-exported or attempted to re-export these supplies to four separate oil rigs located in Iranian territorial waters. The transactional value of the 55 orders is $524,664.

COSL Singapore enters into time charter agreements with third-party drilling companies to allow them to use its oil rigs for drilling operations within a specified territory. COSL Singapore is responsible for maintaining the oil rigs, including procuring equipment and spare parts. Procurement specialists located in Singapore or assigned to an oil rig's base of operations were responsible for day-to-day procurement, including initiating requests for quotation, obtaining quotations, and issuing purchase orders. These specialists purchased at least 55 orders of supplies from vendors located in the United States on behalf of, and specifically intended for shipment and/or re-export to, four COSL Singapore oil rigs operating in Iranian territorial waters. Although some of the purchase order quotations received from U.S. vendors included specific language warning that the goods could not be shipped or re-exported to countries subject to U.S. economic sanctions, specifically including Iran, COSL Singapore purchased the goods and shipped them to the oil rigs over a period of several years.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

OFAC determined that COSL Singapore did not voluntarily disclose the apparent violations and that the apparent violations constitute a non-egregious case. The statutory maximum penalty amount is $13,750,000, and the base penalty amount is $923,000. The settlement amount of $415,350 reflects OFAC's consideration of the facts and circumstances pursuant to the General Factors under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. Part 501, app. A.

Aggravating Factors

  • COSL Singapore failed to exercise a minimal degree of caution when it exported or attempted to export goods from the United States and re-exported or attempted to re-export them to oil rigs located in Iranian territorial waters
  • COSL Singapore's exportation or re-exportation of equipment to the four oil rigs aided in the development of Iran's energy resources
  • COSL Singapore is a large, sophisticated company with 14 offshore drilling rigs doing business throughout the world
  • COSL Singapore did not have an OFAC compliance program in place at the time of the transactions despite conducting business in the United States and/or with U.S. companies in relation to the offshore drilling and petrochemical sectors

Mitigating Factors

  • COSL Singapore has no prior sanctions history with OFAC, including no receipt of a penalty notice or Finding of Violation in the five years preceding the earliest date of these transactions
  • COSL Singapore took remedial action by instituting an OFAC sanctions compliance program
  • COSL Singapore displayed substantial cooperation throughout the course of OFAC's investigation, including by entering into a tolling agreement with OFAC

Compliance Takeaways

Some purchase order quotations received from U.S. vendors included specific language warning that goods could not be shipped or re-exported to countries subject to U.S. economic sanctions, specifically including Iran β€” yet COSL Singapore purchased and shipped the goods regardless. OFAC identified as an aggravating factor that COSL Singapore did not have an OFAC compliance program in place at the time of the transactions despite conducting business in the United States and/or with U.S. companies in relation to the offshore drilling and petrochemical sectors. OFAC credited as a mitigating factor COSL Singapore's remedial action in instituting an OFAC sanctions compliance program following the investigation.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: 5cdc7bb332a0c3226ce0c31f212b3edbca8edfdc49c48ffddafcf684be343af6

More OFAC Cases