SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

e.l.f. Cosmetics, Inc. OFAC Settlement: $996.1K (2019)

Last updated:

e.l.f. Cosmetics, Inc., a cosmetics company, settled its potential civil liability for 156 apparent violations of the North Korea Sanctions Regulations, agreeing to pay $996,080. ELF appears to have violated the regulations by importing 156 shipments of false eyelash kits from two suppliers located in the People's Republic of China that contained materials sourced by these suppliers from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

Penalty Amount

$996,080.00

Enforcement Date

January 31, 2019

Rank in Top Penalties

#108

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
e.l.f. Cosmetics, Inc.
Country:
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States
Industry:
Cosmetics & Beauty
Address:
Oakland, California
Penalty amount:
$996,080.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$2,213,510.00
Max civil monetary penalty:
$40,833,633.00
Egregious case:
No
Apparent violations:
156
Voluntary self disclosure:
Yes
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
April 1, 2012 to January 28, 2017
Program:
North Korea Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 510 (NKSR)
Enforcement date:
January 31, 2019

Nature of the Apparent Violations

ELF appears to have violated ยง 510.201(c) of the NKSR by importing 156 shipments of false eyelash kits from two suppliers located in the People's Republic of China that contained materials sourced by these suppliers from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK). The imports occurred from on or about April 1, 2012 to on or about January 28, 2017, with a total value of $4,427,019.26.

Throughout the violation period, ELF's OFAC compliance program was either non-existent or inadequate. The company's production review efforts focused on quality assurance issues pertaining to the production process, raw materials, and end-products of the goods it purchased and/or imported. Until January 2017, ELF's compliance program and supplier audits failed to discover that approximately 80 percent of the false eyelash kits supplied by the two China-based suppliers contained materials from the DPRK.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

OFAC determined that ELF voluntarily self-disclosed the apparent violations and that the apparent violations constitute a non-egregious case. The statutory maximum civil monetary penalty amount was $40,833,633, and the base civil monetary penalty amount was $2,213,510. The settlement amount of $996,080 reflects OFAC's consideration of the facts and circumstances pursuant to the General Factors under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A.

Aggravating Factors

  • The apparent violations may have resulted in U.S.-origin funds coming under the control of the DPRK government, in direct conflict with the program objectives of the NKSR.
  • ELF is a large and commercially sophisticated company that engages in a substantial volume of international trade.
  • ELF's OFAC compliance program was either non-existent or inadequate throughout the time period in which the apparent violations occurred, and appears not to have exercised sufficient supply chain due diligence while sourcing products from a region that poses a high risk to the effectiveness of the NKSR.

Mitigating Factors

  • ELF's personnel do not appear to have had actual knowledge of the conduct that led to the apparent violations in this investigation.
  • ELF has not received a Penalty Notice or Finding of Violation from OFAC in the five years preceding the earliest date of the transactions giving rise to the apparent violations.
  • The apparent violations do not appear to constitute a significant part of ELF's business activities.
  • ELF cooperated with OFAC by immediately disclosing the apparent violations, signing a tolling agreement, and submitting a complete and satisfactory response to OFAC's request for additional information.

Compliance Takeaways

This enforcement action highlights the risks for companies that do not conduct full-spectrum supply chain due diligence when sourcing products from overseas, particularly in a region in which the DPRK, as well as other comprehensively sanctioned countries or regions, is known to export goods. OFAC encourages companies to develop, implement, and maintain a risk-based approach to sanctions compliance and to implement processes and procedures to identify and mitigate areas of risks. Such steps could include implementing supply chain audits with country-of-origin verification, conducting mandatory OFAC sanctions training for suppliers, and routinely and frequently performing audits of suppliers.

ELF stated the company has taken the following steps to minimize the risk of recurrence: implemented supply chain audits that verify the country of origin of goods and services used in ELF's products; adopted new procedures requiring suppliers to sign certificates of compliance stating they will comply with all U.S. export controls and trade sanctions; conducted an enhanced supplier audit that included verification of payment information related to production materials and review of supplier bank statements; engaged outside counsel to provide additional training for key employees in the United States and China regarding U.S. sanctions regulations and other relevant U.S. laws and regulations; and held mandatory training on U.S. sanctions regulations for employees and suppliers in China, with additional mandatory trainings for new employees and regular refresher training for current employees and suppliers based in China.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: 14649a28fb7848b5c77956656e2ea736cf8692522fbe172c9e389f5c4a2937cf

More OFAC Cases