SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

Great Western Malting Co. OFAC Settlement: $1.3M (2012)

Last updated:

Great Western Malting Co. settled apparent violations of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, agreeing to pay $1,347,750 to resolve conduct that occurred between August 2006 and March 2009, when it performed various back-office functions for the sales by a foreign affiliate of non-U.S. origin barley malt to Cuba.

Penalty Amount

$1,347,750.00

Enforcement Date

July 10, 2012

Rank in Top Penalties

#95

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
Great Western Malting Co.
Country:
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States
Industry:
Food & Beverage
Address:
Vancouver, Washington
Penalty amount:
$1,347,750.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$5,990,000.00
Egregious case:
No
Voluntary self disclosure:
No
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
August 2006 to March 2009
Program:
Cuban Assets Control Regulations
Enforcement date:
July 10, 2012

Nature of the Apparent Violations

Between August 2006 and March 2009, Great Western performed various back-office functions for the sales by a foreign affiliate of non-U.S. origin barley malt to Cuba, in apparent violation of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations. A number of the apparent violations involved transactions with Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs) in Cuba, and some involved transactions which included an SDN vessel.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

The base penalty amount for the apparent violations was $5,990,000. This matter was not the subject of a voluntary disclosure to OFAC, and the apparent violations constitute a non-egregious case. The settlement amount of $1,347,750 reflects OFAC's consideration of facts and circumstances pursuant to the General Factors under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, App. A. Factors considered included that Great Western is a large, sophisticated entity that did not have an adequate OFAC compliance program in place at the time of the violations; that a number of the violations involved transactions with SDNs and one involved an SDN vessel; that Great Western has no prior OFAC violation history; that Great Western substantially cooperated with OFAC, including entering into a statute of limitations tolling agreement; and that if the subject goods had been shipped from the United States, they would have been eligible for an OFAC license.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: 45d2e5d08a6d9c5a66fd74180f7fe51874d1460b56ff12019ea0103760e62c25

More OFAC Cases