SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

U.S. Person-1 OFAC Settlement: $5K (2020)

Last updated:

U.S. Person-1, a natural U.S. person, settled potential civil liability for apparent violations of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Sanctions Regulations by agreeing to pay $5,000. The apparent violations arose out of U.S. Person-1 engaging in at least 24 transactions for the benefit of a foreign individual who at the time was a specially designated narcotics trafficker, while U.S. Person-1 was stationed at a U.S. embassy.

Penalty Amount

$5,000.00

Enforcement Date

August 11, 2020

Rank in Top Penalties

#709

Case Details

Type:
Individual
Name:
U.S. Person-1
Country:
🇺🇸 United States
Industry:
Individual
Penalty amount:
$5,000.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$36,264,793.00
Max civil monetary penalty:
$36,264,793.00
Egregious case:
Yes
Apparent violations:
24
Voluntary self disclosure:
No
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
From 2015
Program:
Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 598 (FNKSR)
Enforcement date:
August 11, 2020

Nature of the Apparent Violations

At the time of the apparent violations, U.S. Person-1 was a civilian direct hire of the U.S. Army stationed at the U.S. embassy in Bogota, Colombia, in a position requiring a security clearance. U.S. Person-1 had also held many national security-related positions prior to being stationed at the embassy.

In 2015, a foreign individual then designated as a specially designated narcotics trafficker ("SDNT-1") was at the embassy for a meeting regarding their designation status. SDNT-1 was accompanied by a former host nation official ("SDNT-2") with whom U.S. Person-1 had a preexisting professional relationship. After the embassy meeting, SDNT-2 introduced SDNT-1 to U.S. Person-1, and the two shortly thereafter began a personal relationship.

U.S. Person-1 was aware that they were having a personal relationship with a specially designated narcotics trafficker. Nonetheless, over the course of a year, U.S. Person-1 bought jewelry, meals, clothing, hotel rooms, and other gifts for SDNT-1 while SDNT-1 was seeking to be removed from the SDN List. During the relationship, U.S. Person-1 conducted internet research concerning the legality of engaging in transactions with persons on OFAC's Specially Designated National and Blocked Persons List, but did not seek further counseling or advice from the various government and legal resources that were readily available in the embassy or by their employer.

These transactions constituted prohibited dealings in blocked property or interests in property of an individual on the SDN List, in apparent violation of 31 C.F.R. § 598.203 of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 598, on at least 24 occasions. The total transaction value of the apparent violations was about $3,349.33.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

The statutory maximum civil monetary penalty applicable in this matter is $36,264,793. OFAC determined that U.S. Person-1 did not voluntarily self-disclose the apparent violations and that the apparent violations constitute an egregious case. Accordingly, under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, the base civil monetary penalty amount applicable in this matter is the statutory maximum of $36,264,793. The settlement amount of $5,000 reflects OFAC's consideration of the General Factors under the Enforcement Guidelines.

Aggravating Factors

  • U.S. Person-1 failed to exercise an appropriate degree of caution or care with respect to the conduct that led to the apparent violations. This included, but was not limited to, U.S. Person-1's failure to approach or use any of the OFAC personnel or other resources available to them to resolve issues arising from forming a new relationship with a foreign person who was also a specially designated narcotics trafficker.
  • U.S. Person-1 was aware that they formed and then maintained a voluntary relationship with a specially designated narcotics trafficker and had actual knowledge of the conduct that led to the Apparent Violations.
  • U.S. Person-1's relationship and transactions with a specially designated narcotics trafficker while that person sought reconsideration of their designation created a perception of impropriety that harms the integrity of all sanctions programs.
  • As a U.S. government employee stationed overseas in a national security position, U.S. Person-1 failed to exercise judgment and an expected degree of caution or care commensurate with that position.

Mitigating Factors

  • U.S. Person-1 was relieved of their duties and is no longer employed by the U.S. government. Additionally, the U.S. Army has taken significant disciplinary action against U.S. Person-1 in connection with this matter.
  • U.S. Person-1 is a natural person who does not appear to have any prior experience with sanctions compliance.
  • Most of the transactions engaged in by U.S. Person-1 for or on behalf of the specially designated narcotics trafficker appear to have been personal in nature and involve goods with a single, immediate, and one-time use with limited or exhausted secondary value.
  • U.S. Person-1 cooperated with OFAC when interviewed and was expeditious and organized in their subpoena response and subsequent communications.

Compliance Takeaways

All U.S. persons, including members of the military and civil service stationed abroad, should exercise caution before voluntarily engaging in relationships with foreign persons that the U.S. person knows, or reasonably should know, may have a sanctions nexus, as any financial transaction or exchange of goods or services with a designated person — even in the context of a personal relationship — may constitute a violation of U.S. sanctions. Those serving in national security positions should be particularly cautious, especially when their voluntary relationships can harm or give the appearance of harming the integrity of government processes.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: a6b75f76b22bb38f22bea604e8b6f32e2233ec897d1cff25fe4f74c0d20551e6

More OFAC Cases