SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

John Bean Technologies OFAC Settlement: $391.9K (2015)

Last updated:

John Bean Technologies Corporation ("JBT") settled alleged violations of Executive Order 13382 of June 28, 2005, "Blocking Property of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators and Their Supporters," and the Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 544, agreeing to pay $391,950 to resolve potential civil liability.

Penalty Amount

$391,950.00

Enforcement Date

June 19, 2015

Rank in Top Penalties

#158

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
John Bean Technologies Corporation
Country:
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States
Industry:
Aviation
Address:
Chicago, Illinois
Penalty amount:
$391,950.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$670,000.00
Egregious case:
No
Voluntary self disclosure:
No
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
April 8, 2009 to July 9, 2009
Program:
Executive Order 13382 of June 28, 2005, "Blocking Property of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators and Their Supporters" (E.O. 13382) and the Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 544
Enforcement date:
June 19, 2015

Nature of the Apparent Violations

JBT's apparent violations arose from a shipment of goods it sold to a Chinese company that was transported by Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL), a blocked entity, aboard a blocked vessel from Spain to China. Three distinct counts were identified under E.O. 13382 and ยง 544.201(a) of the Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 544.

First, from on or about April 8 to April 17, 2009, trade documents related to the IRISL shipment were presented to a U.S. bank for payment pursuant to a letter of credit in the amount of $2,897,936. Second, from on or about May 8 to May 19, 2009, after the U.S. bank declined to advise the letter of credit and the trade documents had been returned to JBT pursuant to an OFAC license, JBT presented those same trade documents to Banco Santander, a Spanish bank, in the amount of $2,897,936 to receive payment for the goods sold to CSA. Third, from on or about May 21 to July 9, 2009, JBT reimbursed JBT AeroTech Spain for charges paid to its freight forwarder for shipping services rendered by IRISL, and to Banco Santander for fees associated with negotiating the letter of credit, in the amount of $164,470.24, via inter-company transfer.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

OFAC determined that JBT did not voluntarily self-disclose the Apparent Violations and that the Apparent Violations constitute a non-egregious case. The base penalty amount was $670,000. The settlement amount of $391,950 reflects OFAC's consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors pursuant to the General Factors under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A.

Aggravating Factors

  • With respect to counts 2 and 3, JBT management knew of the conduct resulting in the Apparent Violations
  • Economic benefit was conferred to a blocked entity, resulting in harm to the sanctions program objectives of the Regulations
  • JBT is a sophisticated entity that conducts business throughout the world

Mitigating Factors

  • JBT has not been the subject of a Penalty Notice or a Finding of Violation from OFAC in the five years preceding the transactions constituting the Apparent Violations
  • JBT implemented some remedial measures to prevent a recurrence of the Apparent Violations, including employee training, enhancements to its compliance program, and enhanced party screening
  • JBT cooperated with OFAC's investigation, including, among other cooperation, by agreeing to toll the statute of limitations for 514 days

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: a0c0ad910ad95c488be3b675bba588a20cc104f2d5fd1312a74b26b31e50f7d5

More OFAC Cases