SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

MetLife OFAC Settlement: $22.5K (2011)

Last updated:

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company settled allegations of a violation of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 515, arising from mailing a check representing a lump sum death benefit payment directly to the beneficiary in Cuba. The company remitted $22,500 to resolve the allegations.

Penalty Amount

$22,500.00

Enforcement Date

April 7, 2011

Rank in Top Penalties

#396

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Country:
🇺🇸 United States
Industry:
Insurance
Address:
New York, NY
Penalty amount:
$22,500.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$50,000.00
Egregious case:
No
Voluntary self disclosure:
No
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
From June 2006
Program:
Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 515
Enforcement date:
April 7, 2011

Nature of the Apparent Violations

In June 2006, MetLife mailed a check representing a $30,162 lump sum death benefit payment directly to the beneficiary in Cuba, in apparent violation of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 515. The matter was not voluntarily disclosed by MetLife; the apparent violation was reported to OFAC and to MetLife by the attorney who administered the estate of the U.S. decedent. Upon receipt of the notice, MetLife stopped payment and deposited the death benefit payment into a blocked account. The funds were subsequently transferred to a bank for distribution to the beneficiary.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

The apparent violation constituted a non-egregious case. The base penalty amount was $50,000, the Applicable Schedule Amount established by the OFAC Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines applicable to the apparent violation. MetLife did not voluntarily disclose the matter. OFAC settled for $22,500, reflecting consideration of the following: MetLife provides specialized insurance services; MetLife has not been the subject of prior OFAC penalties; MetLife cooperated with OFAC by making an authorized transfer of the blocked payment to a blocked account opened in the name of the beneficiary for the purpose of making authorized distributions to the beneficiary; and MetLife has taken several steps to strengthen its OFAC compliance program, including requiring sanctions compliance training of all employees.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: a53feb2542b8500864dfd7f589b72056e77616747b1c08509aa07a00321939dc

More OFAC Cases