Data last synced:
Last updated:
The National Bank of Pakistan's New York Branch settled potential civil liability for seven apparent violations of the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 594, agreeing to remit $28,800 to OFAC. The apparent violations involved funds transfers processed by the branch that were originated by, or destined for, the account of a party designated pursuant to Executive Order 13224.
Penalty Amount
$28,800.00
Enforcement Date
June 18, 2015
Rank in Top Penalties
#363
On May 31, 2013, OFAC designated Kyrgyz Trans Avia, an airline headquartered in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, pursuant to Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, "Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Support Terrorism." Between June 6, 2013 and January 31, 2014, NBP New York processed seven funds transfers totaling $55,952.14 that were originated by, or destined for, the account of "LC Aircompany Kyrgyztransavia" at the National Bank of Pakistan's branch in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan ("NBP Bishkek"). NBP New York's OFAC interdiction filter failed to generate an alert or identify any potential matches to OFAC's List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons when it screened the funds transfers for review, and the bank processed all seven of the transactions forward. The seven transactions constitute apparent violations of ยง 594.201 of the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 594.
OFAC determined that NBP New York did not voluntarily self-disclose the apparent violations and that the apparent violations constitute a non-egregious case. The total base penalty amount for the apparent violations was $64,000. The settlement amount of $28,800 reflects OFAC's consideration of the facts and circumstances pursuant to the General Factors under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A.
This enforcement action highlights the particular sanctions risk faced by the U.S. locations of foreign financial institutions that maintain accounts for persons subject to OFAC sanctions.
This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.
Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.
Archived on June 13, 2026
SHA-256: 845f64e45499069313a45461ba365976fdb5b024e8810773b49c258f34ddf45b