SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

NewTek, Inc. OFAC Settlement: $189.5K (2021)

Last updated:

NewTek, Inc., a company that develops and supplies live production and 3D animation hardware and software systems, settled its potential civil liability for 52 apparent violations of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations. The apparent violations occurred when NewTek exported goods, technology, and services from the United States to third-country distributors that it knew or had reason to know were specifically intended for companies and individuals in Iran. NewTek agreed to pay $189,483 to resolve the matter.

Penalty Amount

$189,483.00

Enforcement Date

September 9, 2021

Rank in Top Penalties

#195

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
NewTek, Inc.
Country:
🇺🇸 United States
Industry:
Hardware & Electronics
Address:
San Antonio, Texas
Penalty amount:
$189,483.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$291,512.00
Max civil monetary penalty:
$15,031,546.00
Egregious case:
No
Apparent violations:
52
Voluntary self disclosure:
Yes
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
December 2013 to May 2018
Program:
Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (ITSR), §§ 560.204 and 560.206Executive Order (E.O.) 13628 of October 9, 2012
Enforcement date:
September 9, 2021

Nature of the Apparent Violations

From approximately December 2013 through May 2018, NewTek exported 49 products from the United States to two third-country distributors with knowledge or reason to know its products were intended specifically for a reseller located in Iran (the "Iranian Reseller"). On at least three occasions, NewTek also provided support, software updates, reseller training, or other services in support of sales to customers located in Iran. The Iranian Reseller sold three of the exported products to Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), an entity on OFAC's SDN List at the time of the relevant exports.

NewTek authorized distribution under two successive distributor agreements. The first, with a company located in France ("Distributor 1"), was in force until approximately October 2014 and authorized distribution and support in the "Middle East" region, which NewTek was informed specifically included Iran. As was evident through communications including monthly sales forecasts for Iran, NewTek knew that Distributor 1 intended to supply products to the Iranian Reseller prior to export, and NewTek provided credits to Distributor 1 for sales to the Iranian Reseller.

Beginning in 2013, NewTek's Chief Operating Officer led negotiations to transfer the Middle East sales territory to a company located in Dubai, UAE ("Distributor 2"). Around October 2014, NewTek and Distributor 2 entered into an agreement that remained in place throughout the relevant period and explicitly listed Iran among the authorized Middle East sales territory countries. As part of the transition, the Iranian Reseller was transferred from Distributor 1's reseller network to Distributor 2's, and NewTek exported goods and services to Distributor 2 intended specifically for the Iranian Reseller.

The conduct constituted apparent violations of §§ 560.204 and 560.206 of the ITSR and of E.O. 13628 with respect to the three products provided to IRIB. The total value of the transactions was $583,024; associated profits amounted to approximately $61,070. NewTek did not have export control or sanctions compliance policies, procedures, or training in place during the relevant period, and incorrectly believed that sales through third-party distributors to the Iranian Reseller were permissible because it did not deal directly with Iran.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

The statutory maximum civil monetary penalty applicable in this matter is $15,031,546. OFAC determined that NewTek voluntarily self-disclosed the apparent violations and that the apparent violations constitute a non-egregious case. Accordingly, under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, the base civil monetary penalty amount applicable in this matter is $291,512. The settlement amount of $189,483 reflects OFAC's consideration of the General Factors under the Enforcement Guidelines.

Aggravating Factors

  • NewTek demonstrated reckless disregard for U.S. sanctions requirements by specifically authorizing distribution and support of its goods in Iran pursuant to its arrangements with two third-party distributors, knowing that relevant sanctions regulations generally barred dealings with Iran and relying on a mistaken understanding that its indirect dealings were permissible.
  • NewTek possessed actual knowledge of the conduct leading to the apparent violations. NewTek employees at all levels within the company, including managers and certain members of NewTek's four-member executive board, possessed direct knowledge and/or reason to know that NewTek products were exported to distributors intended specifically for sale to an Iranian Reseller and to end users located in Iran.
  • The sales of NewTek products to resellers and customers located in Iran caused harm to U.S. sanctions objectives by facilitating access to NewTek products and support services by resellers and users in Iran, including an Iranian electronics company that was part of NewTek's reseller network, and to an entity on the SDN List.

Mitigating Factors

  • The volume and total amount of payments underlying the apparent violations was not significant compared to NewTek's overall revenue. NewTek is a relatively small company that has not received a Penalty Notice or Finding of Violation from OFAC in the five years preceding the earliest date of the transactions giving rise to the apparent violations.
  • NewTek took the following remedial actions: established export controls and sanctions compliance policies and procedures; hired a Director of Compliance; provided compliance training to employees in sales, marketing, shipping, service, and compliance; obtained formal export classifications from the U.S. Department of Commerce confirming that NewTek's products are properly designated EAR99 for export control purposes; implemented bulk name screening of product registrants and current and pending distributors against the SDN List; and implemented geo-IP blocking measures to prevent individuals located in Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, and the Crimea region of Ukraine from downloading or registering NewTek products.
  • NewTek substantially cooperated with OFAC during the course of the investigation.

Compliance Takeaways

This enforcement action serves as a reminder that sales to third-country distributors with knowledge or reason to know that goods are intended specifically for Iran can give rise to apparent violations of the ITSR. Reliance on the understanding of an individual in a managerial or supervisory role, or reliance on informal sanctions compliance measures, may not be sufficient to mitigate sanctions compliance risks. Companies should make certain to have an accurate understanding of relevant U.S. sanctions regulations, especially when selling to global markets using sales models where potentially violative conduct may be more likely.

Commensurate with their risks, companies may consider sanctions compliance measures such as written policies and processes that address applicable sanctions concerns and clear guidance for employees. Employee trainings and education that ensure accurate understanding of relevant sanctions regulations are essential to an effective sanctions compliance program.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: 867832a6a862be0217b9b3cc23280d6bb9715df3314199eacf16dd7f14629316

More OFAC Cases