SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

Norton Lilly International OFAC Civil Penalty: $18.8K

Last updated:

Norton Lilly International was assessed a penalty of $18,750 for its violation of the Iranian Transactions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 560. Norton engaged in a transaction or dealing related to services of Iranian origin, and facilitated a transaction by a foreign person involving Iranian-origin services, arising from conduct that occurred in November 2006.

Penalty Amount

$18,750.00

Enforcement Date

August 16, 2011

Rank in Top Penalties

#428

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
Norton Lilly International
Country:
🇺🇸 United States
Industry:
Shipping
Address:
Mobile, AL
Penalty amount:
$18,750.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$25,000.00
Egregious case:
No
Voluntary self disclosure:
No
Case:
Assessed a Penalty
Violation period:
From November 2006
Program:
Iranian Transactions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 560
Enforcement date:
August 16, 2011

Nature of the Apparent Violations

The violation occurred in November 2006, when Norton engaged in a transaction or dealing related to services of Iranian origin and facilitated a transaction by a foreign person involving Iranian-origin services. Norton acted as a paying agent for a foreign entity to pay port charges incurred at an Iranian port in the amount of $14,936.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

OFAC determined that Norton did not voluntarily self-disclose the violation and that the violation constituted a non-egregious case. The base penalty amount was $25,000. OFAC assessed a penalty of $18,750 after considering General Factors under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines: Norton had knowledge or reason to know that the conduct involved port charges with respect to a ship calling in Iran; Norton did not have a compliance program in place at the time of the violation; Norton cooperated with OFAC by promptly responding to OFAC's administrative subpoena and providing all relevant information regarding the violation; Norton instituted remedial measures by adopting procedures to comply with OFAC's regulations; and Norton had not been subject to an OFAC enforcement action in the five years preceding the date of the violation.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: 450a29a84a457001f46ea0b6e08c31ae5bd66352504d6d95a3f765c75b8682c4

More OFAC Cases