SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

Sandhill Scientific, Inc. OFAC Settlement: $126K (2012)

Last updated:

Sandhill Scientific, Inc., a U.S. manufacturer of medical equipment, settled alleged violations of the Iranian Transactions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 560, and OFAC's Reporting, Procedures and Penalties Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 501, by agreeing to remit $126,000. OFAC alleged that Sandhill exported medical equipment to Dubai, United Arab Emirates, with knowledge or reason to know that the goods were intended for transshipment or supply to a company in Iran, and separately failed to provide documents responsive to two administrative subpoenas issued during OFAC's investigation.

Penalty Amount

$126,000.00

Enforcement Date

April 25, 2012

Rank in Top Penalties

#225

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
Sandhill Scientific, Inc.
Country:
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States
Industry:
Healthcare
Address:
Highlands Ranch, CO
Penalty amount:
$126,000.00
Egregious case:
Yes
Voluntary self disclosure:
No
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
May 2007 to July 2008
Program:
Iranian Transactions Regulations ("ITR"), 31 C.F.R. part 560Reporting, Procedures and Penalties Regulations ("RPPR"), 31 C.F.R. part 501
Enforcement date:
April 25, 2012

Nature of the Apparent Violations

OFAC alleged that on or about May 4, 2007, Sandhill exported medical equipment valued at approximately $6,700 to Dubai, United Arab Emirates, with knowledge or reason to know that the goods were intended for transshipment or supply to a company in Iran with which Sandhill had an exclusive distributor agreement, in apparent violation of the Iranian Transactions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 560. OFAC further alleged that Sandhill failed to provide documents responsive to two administrative subpoenas issued by OFAC during its investigation, on separate occasions in May and July 2008, in apparent violation of OFAC's Reporting, Procedures and Penalties Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 501.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

The matter was not voluntarily disclosed to OFAC. OFAC determined that the alleged ITR violation constituted an egregious case because Sandhill's unlicensed export appears to have resulted from willful and reckless conduct in which the company's management was directly involved; Sandhill appears to have deliberately concealed the fact that the goods were destined for Iran; and Sandhill did not fully cooperate with the investigation. These determinations resulted in a base penalty of $250,000 for the alleged ITR violation.

For the two alleged RPPR violations, OFAC's Enforcement Guidelines provide that, where the value of the underlying transaction is $500,000 or less, failure to comply with an administrative subpoena may result in a civil penalty of up to $20,000 irrespective of whether any other violation is alleged. Because the exported equipment had a value of approximately $6,700, the base penalty for the two alleged RPPR violations totaled $40,000.

The $126,000 settlement amount reflects OFAC's further consideration of the following General Factors: Sandhill does not appear to have had any compliance program in place at the time of the alleged violations; Sandhill does not appear to have taken any remedial action after the alleged violations came to its attention; the export may have been eligible for an OFAC license pursuant to ยง 560.530 of the ITR; and OFAC has no record of any prior sanctions enforcement actions involving Sandhill.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: 048ef7015c94d6b16aa9e14dfcf63f24dfbba44f099e91a9f547d4e426e1ebce

More OFAC Cases