SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

Sea Tel Inc. OFAC Settlement: $85.1K (2014)

Last updated:

Sea Tel Inc. settled potential civil liability for apparent violations of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, agreeing to pay $85,113 to resolve the matter with OFAC.

Penalty Amount

$85,113.00

Enforcement Date

April 2, 2014

Rank in Top Penalties

#252

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
Sea Tel Inc.
Country:
🇺🇸 United States
Industry:
Telecom
Address:
Concord, CA
Penalty amount:
$85,113.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$189,141.00
Egregious case:
No
Voluntary self disclosure:
Yes
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
November 20, 2007 to February 26, 2009
Program:
Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations ("ITSR"), 31 C.F.R. part 560
Enforcement date:
April 2, 2014

Nature of the Apparent Violations

Between November 20, 2007, and February 26, 2009, Sea Tel invoiced its distributor, Shindong Digitech Co. Ltd., in South Korea for 16 orders of marine antenna systems, with a total value of $378,281, and exported the antenna systems to its distributor with knowledge or reason to know that they were intended specifically for reexportation, directly or indirectly, to Iran. The antenna systems were for installation and use on vessels owned by the National Iranian Tanker Company ("NITC"), an Iranian entity. A Sea Tel sales manager had reason to know that the antenna systems were destined for NITC and authorized the shipments.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

This matter was voluntarily disclosed to OFAC by Sea Tel and the apparent violations constitute a non-egregious case. The base penalty amount for the apparent violations was $189,141. The settlement amount of $85,113 reflects OFAC's consideration of the General Factors under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A.

Compliance Takeaways

Sea Tel is a sophisticated international business that should have had more than just general policies and procedures in place to ensure OFAC compliance, including appropriate mechanisms to determine the location of, and other information related to, the ultimate purchasers or users of its products. Sea Tel showed reckless disregard for U.S. sanctions by shipping goods for reexport to NITC without adequate due diligence, and its reckless conduct constituted a pattern, providing antenna systems on 16 occasions over 15 months.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: 35aa65a33636c9b76f56c48593720f37e43b2a326a95a364efe713e2db897c75

More OFAC Cases