SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

Société Générale S.A. OFAC Settlement: $53.97M (2018)

Last updated:

Société Générale S.A., a financial institution headquartered in France, settled its potential civil liability for 1,077 apparent violations of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, and the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations by agreeing to remit $53,966,916.05 to OFAC. The apparent violations arose from Société Générale S.A.'s processing of transactions to or through the United States or U.S. financial institutions that involved countries or persons subject to OFAC-administered sanctions programs. This settlement with OFAC was part of a global settlement among Société Générale S.A. and multiple U.S. federal and state authorities.

Penalty Amount

$53,966,916.05

Enforcement Date

November 19, 2018

Rank in Top Penalties

#20

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
Société Générale S.A.
Country:
🇫🇷 France
Industry:
Banking
Address:
Paris, France
Penalty amount:
$53,966,916.05
Base civil monetary penalty:
$101,630,490.80
Egregious case:
Yes
Apparent violations:
1077
Voluntary self disclosure:
Yes
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
July 9, 2007 to March 19, 2012
Program:
Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 515 (CACR)Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 560 (ITSR)Sudanese Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 538 (SSR)
Enforcement date:
November 19, 2018

Nature of the Apparent Violations

For at least five years up to and including 2012, Société Générale S.A. processed transactions to or through the United States or U.S. financial institutions that involved countries or persons subject to the sanctions programs administered by OFAC. Société Générale S.A. often processed these transactions in a non-transparent manner that removed, omitted, obscured, or otherwise failed to include references to OFAC-sanctioned parties in the information sent to the U.S. financial institutions involved in the transactions.

The 1,077 apparent violations encompassed three sanctions programs. Société Générale S.A. processed 796 transactions involving Cuba totaling approximately $5,503,813,992.25 between July 11, 2007 and October 26, 2010, in apparent violation of the CACR. Société Générale S.A. processed 30 transactions involving Iran totaling approximately $34,152,962.50 between November 20, 2008 and January 20, 2009, in apparent violation of the ITSR. Société Générale S.A. processed 251 transactions involving Sudan totaling $22,486,039.61 between July 9, 2007 and March 19, 2012, in apparent violation of the SSR.

The conduct occurred across multiple bank units and business lines and apparently continued practices set out in stripping instructions that the bank drafted, disseminated, and revoked prior to 2007. Numerous Société Générale S.A. employees and members of bank management across multiple business lines and bank locations had actual knowledge of the conduct.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

OFAC determined that Société Générale S.A. voluntarily self-disclosed the Apparent Violations and that the Apparent Violations constitute an egregious case. The total base penalty amount for all Apparent Violations was $101,630,490.80, comprising a base penalty of $25,870,000.00 for the Cuba-related apparent violations under the CACR, $34,152,962.50 for the Iran-related apparent violations under the ITSR, and $41,656,278.22 for the Sudan-related apparent violations under the SSR. The settlement amount of $53,966,916.05 reflects OFAC's consideration of the facts and circumstances pursuant to the General Factors Affecting Administrative Action under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. Part 501, app. A. This OFAC settlement is part of a global settlement among Société Générale S.A., OFAC, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the U.S. Department of Justice, the New York County District Attorney's Office, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and the New York State Department of Financial Services.

Aggravating Factors

  • Société Générale S.A. had indications that its conduct might constitute a violation of U.S. law, and certain Société Générale S.A. employees demonstrated awareness that Société Générale S.A.'s conduct constituted a violation of U.S. law before and at the time the Apparent Violations took place.
  • Société Générale S.A. exercised a reckless disregard for U.S. sanctions requirements when it demonstrated a pattern or practice across multiple bank units and business lines of processing transactions to or through U.S. financial institutions after removing, omitting, obscuring, or otherwise failing to include the involvement of OFAC-sanctioned parties in associated payment instructions, which apparently continued practices set out in stripping instructions that the bank drafted, disseminated, and revoked prior to 2007.
  • Société Générale S.A. ignored warning signs that its conduct could have constituted an apparent violation of U.S. sanctions laws on numerous occasions, including on numerous occasions when U.S. financial institutions rejected payment instructions containing references to OFAC-sanctioned parties, and when bank employees read OFAC's enforcement actions and discussed the similarities between the conduct in those enforcement actions and Société Générale S.A.'s payment practices.
  • Numerous Société Générale S.A. employees and members of the bank's management across multiple business lines and bank locations had actual knowledge of the conduct that led to the Apparent Violations.
  • Société Générale S.A.'s conduct conferred significant economic benefit to persons subject to U.S. sanctions and undermined the integrity and policy objectives of multiple U.S. sanctions programs.
  • Société Générale S.A. is a large and commercially sophisticated financial institution.

Mitigating Factors

  • Société Générale S.A. has not received a Penalty Notice or Finding of Violation from OFAC in the five years preceding the date of the earliest transaction giving rise to the Apparent Violations.
  • Société Générale S.A. cooperated with OFAC's investigation of the Apparent Violations by conducting an internal investigation, responding to multiple requests for information in a timely manner, and executing a statute of limitations tolling agreement with multiple extensions.
  • Société Générale S.A. took remedial action in response to the apparent violations: terminated the conduct outlined above and established, and agrees to maintain, policies and procedures that prohibit, and are designed to minimize the risk of the recurrence of, similar conduct in the future; created a centralized sanctions compliance function, implemented key enhancements at the group level, and implemented enhancements within the business lines that were subject to the review; increased the number of personnel within compliance staffing, with total budget for sanctions compliance also increased; implemented a more comprehensive training regime for employees across the group and various business lines, including a group-wide general training program and targeted, in-person training developed by Group Sanctions Compliance for employees with a higher risk of exposure to sanctions-related transactions.

Compliance Takeaways

Processing transactions to or through U.S. financial institutions by removing, omitting, or obscuring references to OFAC-sanctioned parties in payment instructions — even after formal stripping instructions are revoked — creates apparent violations across multiple programs. Rejections of payment instructions by U.S. correspondent banks, and bank employee discussions noting similarities between internal payment practices and published OFAC enforcement actions, were identified as warning signs that were ignored. Actual knowledge of non-compliant conduct among numerous employees and bank management without corrective action was treated as a significant aggravating factor.

In response, Société Générale S.A. established a centralized sanctions compliance function, implemented group-level and business-line-level enhancements, increased compliance staffing and budget, and deployed a comprehensive training regime including targeted, in-person training for employees with higher risk of exposure to sanctions-related transactions.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: 3a2222fcc8f8717aba50c8e4458928545d5b7eccc5d6ccc2e92d98df73f58a41

More OFAC Cases