SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

General Electric OFAC Settlement: $2.7M (2019)

Last updated:

The General Electric Company ("GE"), on behalf of three current and former GE subsidiaries — Getsco Technical Services Inc., Bentley Nevada, and GE Betz (collectively, the "GE Companies") — settled its potential civil liability for 289 alleged violations of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 515, agreeing to pay $2,718,581. Between December 2010 and February 2014, the GE Companies appear to have violated the Cuban Assets Control Regulations by accepting payment from The Cobalt Refinery Company ("Cobalt"), a specially designated national (SDN) of Cuba, for goods and services provided to a Canadian customer of GE.

Penalty Amount

$2,718,581.00

Enforcement Date

October 1, 2019

Rank in Top Penalties

#76

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
The General Electric Company on behalf of Getsco Technical Services Inc., Bentley Nevada, and GE Betz
Country:
🇺🇸 United States
Industry:
Machinery & Equipment
Address:
Boston, Massachusetts
Penalty amount:
$2,718,581.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$3,377,119.00
Max civil monetary penalty:
$18,785,000.00
Egregious case:
No
Apparent violations:
289
Voluntary self disclosure:
Yes
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
December 9, 2010 to February 28, 2014
Program:
Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 515 (CACR)
Enforcement date:
October 1, 2019

Nature of the Apparent Violations

Between December 2010 and February 2014, the GE Companies appear to have violated § 515.201(b) of the CACR on 289 occasions by accepting payment from The Cobalt Refinery Company ("Cobalt") for goods and services provided to a Canadian customer. Since June 1995, Cobalt had been identified as a specially designated national (SDN) of Cuba and appeared on OFAC's SDN List. Cobalt is one of three entities owned by a public joint venture between GE's Canadian customer and the Cuban government. From at least 1996, the GE Companies maintained — and renewed on at least 18 occasions — this customer relationship despite the obvious sanctions risk posed by the relationship.

On February 24, 2014, GE Working Capital Solutions discovered that from at least 2010 to 2014, the GE Companies received numerous payments directly from Cobalt for invoices issued to GE's Canadian customer. While the GE Companies negotiated and entered into contracts with GE's Canadian customer and sent all invoices to that customer, Cobalt paid the GE Companies in more than 65 percent of the total transactions. The GE Companies approved Cobalt as a third-party payer and, over a four-year period, failed to appropriately recognize the significant and widely published relationship between Cobalt and their Canadian customer and did not undertake sufficient diligence into their customer's activities. The GE Companies deposited all checks received from Cobalt into GE's bank account at a Canadian financial institution. The checks contained Cobalt's full legal entity name as it appears on OFAC's SDN List as well as an acronym for Cobalt ("Corefco"), but the GE Companies' sanctions screening software, which screened only the abbreviation of the SDN's name, never alerted on Cobalt's name.

In total, the GE Companies received 289 checks directly from Cobalt from on or about December 9, 2010 to on or about February 28, 2014, totaling approximately $8,018,615. Additionally, goods and services the GE Companies provided to their Canadian customer were, in turn, used to supply utility services and other benefits to Cobalt, which is co-located with GE's Canadian customer.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

The statutory maximum civil monetary penalty applicable in this matter is $18,785,000. OFAC determined that GE voluntarily self-disclosed the alleged violations, and that the alleged violations constitute a non-egregious case. Accordingly, under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, the base civil monetary penalty amount applicable in this matter is $3,377,119. The settlement amount of $2,718,581 reflects OFAC's consideration of the General Factors under the Enforcement Guidelines.

Aggravating Factors

  • The GE Companies failed to take proper or reasonable care with respect to their U.S. economic sanctions obligations — particularly given GE's commercial sophistication. GE failed to identify that (i) for at least four years it was receiving payments that were on their face from a SDN of Cuba that has been on the SDN List since 1995, and (ii) it was providing goods and services to a customer that provides a direct and indirect benefit to a facility owned and operated by that designated Cuban company.
  • The GE Companies' actions caused substantial harm to the objectives of the Cuba sanctions program by conducting a large volume of high-value transactions directly with a Cuban company on the SDN List over a period of many years.
  • The substance of GE's disclosures and other communications with OFAC leave substantial uncertainty about the totality of the benefits conferred to a Cuban company on the SDN List by the GE Companies through their Canadian customer, which had substantial and public ties to Cuba and the Cuban mining industry. While OFAC considered certain jurisdictional limitations on GE's ability to provide a full picture of the scope of work performed at the request of its Canadian customer, at all relevant times, GE had reason to know of its customer's specific and longstanding relationship with Cobalt. GE should have treated its Canadian customer as higher risk due to the customer's publicly known joint venture with Cuba and substantial reliance on Cuban-origin ore. Finally, despite the provision to GE of OFAC's Office of Enforcement Data Delivery Standards, GE did not provide its primary submissions to OFAC in a clear and organized manner and the submissions contained numerous inaccuracies, placing a substantial resource burden on OFAC during the course of its investigation.

Mitigating Factors

  • None of the GE Companies has received a penalty notice or Finding of Violation from OFAC in the five years preceding the date of the earliest transaction giving rise to the alleged violations.
  • GE identified the alleged violations by testing and auditing its compliance program. Additionally, GE implemented remedial measures and new processes to enhance its sanctions compliance procedures, including developing a training video for all company employees using the alleged violations as a case study.
  • GE cooperated with OFAC by executing and extending multiple statute of limitations tolling agreements.

Compliance Takeaways

This enforcement action highlights the sanctions risks to U.S. companies and their foreign subsidiaries associated with (i) accepting payments from third parties and (ii) conducting transactions in foreign currency or at a foreign financial institution. Additionally, this action demonstrates the importance of conducting appropriate due diligence on customers and other counter-parties when initiating and renewing customer relationships. Ongoing compliance measures should be taken throughout the life of commercial relationships.

As noted in OFAC's Framework for Compliance Commitments, U.S. companies can mitigate sanctions risk by conducting risk assessments and exercising caution when doing business with entities that are affiliated with, or known to transact with, OFAC-sanctioned persons or jurisdictions, or that otherwise pose high risks due to their joint ventures, affiliates, subsidiaries, customers, suppliers, geographic location, or the products and services they offer.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: 672d08f9b8d00c2bfdcb0d186bfd4ccc3427697eae18af355f6dc58e76a4c096

More OFAC Cases