SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

Toyota Motor Credit Corporation OFAC Settlement: $23.4K

Last updated:

Toyota Motor Credit Corporation settled potential civil liability for 26 apparent violations of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Sanctions Regulations, agreeing to remit $23,400 to the Office of Foreign Assets Control. OFAC determined that TMCC did not voluntarily self-disclose the apparent violations and that the apparent violations constituted a non-egregious case.

Penalty Amount

$23,400.00

Enforcement Date

April 25, 2013

Rank in Top Penalties

#391

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Country:
🇺🇸 United States
Industry:
Banking
Penalty amount:
$23,400.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$26,000.00
Egregious case:
No
Apparent violations:
26
Voluntary self disclosure:
No
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
April 6, 2008 to June 30, 2010
Program:
Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 598
Enforcement date:
April 25, 2013

Nature of the Apparent Violations

Between April 6, 2008, and June 30, 2010, TMCC maintained a loan account for, and processed instead of blocked, 26 loan payments totaling $14,449 on behalf of Claudia Aguirre Sanchez. OFAC had designated Aguirre Sanchez as a Specially Designated Narcotics Trafficker pursuant to the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act, 21 U.S.C. 1901 et seq., and added her to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List on December 12, 2007 — more than four months before the first transaction. All 26 apparent violations related to one account and constituted apparent violations of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 598.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

OFAC determined that TMCC did not voluntarily self-disclose the apparent violations and that the apparent violations constituted a non-egregious case. The total base penalty amount was $26,000. The settlement amount of $23,400 reflects OFAC's consideration of facts and circumstances pursuant to the General Factors under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A. Mitigation was extended because TMCC had not received a penalty notice or Finding of Violation from OFAC in the five years preceding the date of the transactions; the apparent violations likely would have been licensed by OFAC under licensing policy existing at the time; TMCC cooperated with OFAC throughout its investigation; and TMCC took appropriate remedial action in response to the apparent violations. This mitigation was offset by aggravating factors.

Aggravating Factors

  • TMCC's failure to conduct an adequate review of an alert warning of a possible OFAC violation for nearly one year constituted a reckless disregard for U.S. sanctions requirements
  • An employee TMCC had placed in charge of OFAC compliance for its retail and lease portfolios, who was aware that the institution may have been maintaining an account for an SDNT, failed to exercise what OFAC considered to be a minimum degree of caution in avoiding the apparent violations by clearing the alert without appropriate investigation after being unable to locate the relevant TMCC customer file
  • TMCC is a commercially sophisticated financial institution
  • TMCC's compliance program at the time of the apparent violations was not adequate to handle the company's volume of business

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: 4d0b3baaab7b92674badf94ee785fa9eb707f661f3399d00ab6735c9646d8ed2

More OFAC Cases