SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

Trans Pacific National Bank OFAC Settlement: $12.5K

Last updated:

Trans Pacific National Bank settled apparent violations of the Iranian Transactions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 560, arising from two wire transfers initiated on behalf of an account holder for an underlying commercial transaction prohibited by the Regulations. Trans Pacific remitted $12,500 to resolve the matter.

Penalty Amount

$12,500.00

Enforcement Date

January 31, 2011

Rank in Top Penalties

#501

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
Trans Pacific National Bank
Country:
🇺🇸 United States
Industry:
Banking
Address:
San Francisco, CA
Penalty amount:
$12,500.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$50,000.00
Egregious case:
Unknown
Apparent violations:
2
Voluntary self disclosure:
No
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
September 18, 2007 to March 19, 2008
Program:
Iranian Transactions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 560
Enforcement date:
January 31, 2011

Nature of the Apparent Violations

OFAC alleged that Trans Pacific engaged in transactions or dealings in or related to goods of Iranian origin and services for exportation to Iran, and facilitated transactions by a foreign person where the transactions by the foreign person would be prohibited by the Iranian Transactions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 560, if performed by a United States person. Trans Pacific initiated two separate wire transfers on behalf of an account holder for an underlying commercial transaction prohibited by the Regulations. The transactions occurred on or about September 18, 2007, and on or about March 19, 2008. In one instance, the wire transfer instructions referenced "Iranian material" and in the other instance the instructions referenced "Iran material." The value of the transactions totaled $35,600.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

Trans Pacific did not voluntarily disclose this matter to OFAC. The base penalty amount was $50,000. The $12,500 settlement amount reflects that Trans Pacific's filtering system was not designed to detect references to sanctions targets in the "Originator to Beneficiary Information" field, leading to both apparent violations; that Trans Pacific enhanced its compliance program in response by requiring memorandum information of each wire transfer to be reviewed for OFAC sanctions references and strengthened its escalation procedures in the event of a possible OFAC sanctions reference; and that Trans Pacific had not been subject to prior OFAC enforcement action and fully cooperated with OFAC's investigation.

Compliance Takeaways

The apparent violations arose because Trans Pacific's filtering system was not designed to detect references to sanctions targets in the "Originator to Beneficiary Information" field of wire transfers — a gap that allowed two prohibited transactions to pass through despite containing explicit references to Iran in the wire instructions. In response, Trans Pacific required that the memorandum information of each wire transfer also be reviewed for OFAC sanctions references, and strengthened its escalation procedures in the event of a possible OFAC sanctions reference.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: 766ef650e2778b17ec0c2d2ead3262c926f90bf018810c8ff653982238cee66b

More OFAC Cases