SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

American Honda Finance OFAC Settlement: $87.3K (2017)

Last updated:

American Honda Finance Corporation (AHFC), a motor vehicle finance company headquartered in California that specializes in various forms of financing for purchasers, lessees, and authorized independent dealers of Honda and Acura products, settled its potential civil liability for 13 apparent violations of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 515, agreeing to remit $87,255 to OFAC. The apparent violations stemmed from lease agreements that AHFC's majority-owned Canadian subsidiary, Honda Canada Finance, Inc. (HCFI), approved and financed in connection with the Embassy of Cuba between February 2011 and March 2014.

Penalty Amount

$87,255.00

Enforcement Date

June 8, 2017

Rank in Top Penalties

#250

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
American Honda Finance Corporation
Country:
🇺🇸 United States
Industry:
Banking
Address:
California
Penalty amount:
$87,255.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$138,500.00
Egregious case:
No
Apparent violations:
13
Voluntary self disclosure:
Yes
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
February 28, 2011 to March 3, 2014
Program:
Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 515 (CACR)
Enforcement date:
June 8, 2017

Nature of the Apparent Violations

The conduct was carried out through Honda Canada Finance, Inc. (HCFI), a majority-owned subsidiary of AHFC located in Canada. Between February 28, 2011 and March 3, 2014, HCFI approved and financed 13 lease agreements between an unaffiliated Honda dealership in Ottawa, Canada and the Embassy of Cuba in connection with the Cuban Embassy's leasing of several Honda vehicles, totaling $276,999. The Cuban entity had the word "Cuba" in its name and provided documentation to HCFI demonstrating it was a Government of Cuba entity.

Although AHFC and HCFI had policies and procedures in place to review transactions against OFAC's List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons for compliance with U.S. economic sanctions laws, they did not include the names of countries subject to OFAC-administered comprehensive sanctions in their screening system. AHFC and HCFI were not involved in the business of exporting vehicles internationally.

Three of the 13 lease agreements, totaling $58,281, were initiated and/or approved by HCFI on or about March 3, 2014, approximately two months after AHFC submitted its initial voluntary self-disclosure to OFAC regarding similar apparent violations.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

OFAC determined that AHFC voluntarily self-disclosed the apparent violations and that the apparent violations constitute a non-egregious case. The total base penalty amount for the 13 apparent violations was $138,500. The settlement amount of $87,255 reflects OFAC's consideration of the facts and circumstances pursuant to the General Factors under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A.

Aggravating Factors

  • AHFC had reason to know of the conduct that led to the Alleged Violations, particularly the transactions that occurred after AHFC had filed its initial voluntary self-disclosure with OFAC.
  • HCFI personnel appear to have had actual knowledge of the Cuban Embassy's involvement in the lease agreements in question.
  • The Alleged Violations resulted in harm to U.S. sanctions program objectives at the time they occurred.
  • AHFC is a large and commercially sophisticated financial institution.

Mitigating Factors

  • AHFC has not received a penalty notice or Finding of Violation from OFAC in the five years preceding the earliest date of the transactions giving rise to the Alleged Violations.
  • AHFC took remedial action in response to the Alleged Violations, including by implementing a new policy governing its OFAC policies and proprietary systems.
  • AHFC cooperated with OFAC's investigation by voluntarily self-disclosing the Alleged Violations, providing detailed and well-organized information in a timely and efficient manner, and by signing and extending a statute of limitations tolling agreement.
  • While the transactions described above constitute apparent violations of the CACR, OFAC issued a specific license to AHFC in June 2015 regarding the subject leases.

Compliance Takeaways

AHFC and HCFI had sanctions screening in place but configured it only against OFAC's List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons, without including the names of countries subject to OFAC-administered comprehensive sanctions programs. This gap allowed 13 lease agreements with a Government of Cuba entity (one whose name contained the word "Cuba" and which had provided documentation confirming its status) to proceed without being flagged. In response to the apparent violations, AHFC implemented a new policy governing its OFAC compliance procedures and proprietary systems. OFAC treated as an aggravating factor the transactions that occurred after AHFC had already filed its initial voluntary self-disclosure, reflecting that ongoing conduct following a VSD can weigh against a lower settlement outcome.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: a32f2ff7a4e70b509e9e492023edd27027dc7ba2632e9b9c45f834e458685372

More OFAC Cases