SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

National Australia Bank Ltd. OFAC Settlement: $100K

Last updated:

National Australia Bank Ltd. settled alleged violations of the Burmese Sanctions Regulations, the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations, and the Cuban Assets Control Regulations by remitting $100,000 to OFAC. The alleged violations involved the processing of several transactions through the United States between November 2003 and December 2005.

Penalty Amount

$100,000.00

Enforcement Date

September 7, 2007

Rank in Top Penalties

#240

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
National Australia Bank Ltd.
Country:
🇦🇺 Australia
Industry:
Banking
Address:
New York City
Penalty amount:
$100,000.00
Egregious case:
Unknown
Voluntary self disclosure:
Yes
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
November 2003 to December 2005
Program:
Burmese Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 537Sudanese Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 538Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 515
Enforcement date:
September 7, 2007

Nature of the Apparent Violations

The alleged violations involved the processing of several transactions through the United States under the Burmese Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 537, the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 538, and the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 515, between November 2003 and December 2005. Some of the transactions were processed through NAB's branch in New York City, but the majority were processed through correspondent accounts held by it at other U.S. banks.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

The transactions were voluntarily disclosed to OFAC following an extensive review by NAB of all of its transactions that were processed through the United States during this time period. Due to the significant remediation taken by the bank, including major upgrades to its worldwide compliance policies, as well as the fact that the violations were voluntarily disclosed, OFAC mitigated the potential penalties for these transactions by nearly 90%, resulting in a $100,000 settlement.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: 19975201c43a09706d23499424521d3c3ac1cd393685c7b86533a64df42db6db

More OFAC Cases