SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

Compass Bank OFAC Settlement: $19.1K (2013)

Last updated:

Compass Bank settled potential civil liability for one apparent violation of the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 538, agreeing to remit $19,125. OFAC determined that Compass did not voluntarily self-disclose the apparent violation and that the apparent violation constituted a non-egregious case.

Penalty Amount

$19,125.00

Enforcement Date

December 3, 2013

Rank in Top Penalties

#421

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
Compass Bank
Country:
🇺🇸 United States
Industry:
Banking
Address:
Birmingham, Alabama
Penalty amount:
$19,125.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$25,000.00
Egregious case:
No
Apparent violations:
1
Voluntary self disclosure:
No
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
From February 10, 2011
Program:
Sudanese Sanctions Regulations ("SSR"), 31 C.F.R. part 538
Enforcement date:
December 3, 2013

Nature of the Apparent Violations

On February 10, 2011, Compass originated an £8,900 (approximately $14,898) wire transfer on behalf of an individual customer, destined for a third-country company's account at a financial institution in the United Kingdom. An invoice accompanying the wire transfer request indicated that the purpose of the transaction was a payment for the shipment of a tractor from the United Kingdom to Omdurman, Sudan. A Compass OFAC Assistant Manager and a Compass BSA OFAC Manager reviewed the wire request and associated invoice, and determined that the payment did not violate the SSR because none of the parties involved were on the List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons, and because they mistakenly concluded that the underlying purpose of the payment was authorized pursuant to a general license. This conduct gave rise to one apparent violation of §§ 538.205 and 538.206 of the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 538.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

OFAC determined that Compass did not voluntarily self-disclose the apparent violation and that the apparent violation constituted a non-egregious case. OFAC concluded that the apparent violation was not the result of willful or reckless conduct. The total base penalty amount for the apparent violation was $25,000. OFAC further reduced the proposed penalty in light of Compass' agreement to settle its potential liability for the apparent violation, resulting in a final settlement amount of $19,125.

Aggravating Factors

  • Compass managers and supervisors had actual knowledge of the conduct at issue and were alerted that the wire transfer implicated the SSR
  • Compass managers whose primary responsibility includes OFAC compliance demonstrated a lack of understanding of the SSR

Mitigating Factors

  • The apparent violation did not confer economic benefit on a sanctioned entity because another financial institution successfully interdicted and rejected the transaction
  • Compass has not received a penalty notice or Finding of Violation from OFAC in the five years preceding the date of the transactions giving rise to the apparent violation
  • Compass cooperated with OFAC's investigation of this matter
  • Compass took appropriate remedial action in response to this apparent violation

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: 6ef864ba85e8e22f738d1b32505280d15a9ea925d42fb82c1cb212a96ca2e55c

More OFAC Cases