SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

Gracetown, Inc. OFAC Penalty Notice: $7.1M (2025)

Last updated:

Gracetown, Inc., a property management company, was assessed a $7,139,305 penalty for violating OFAC's Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations and for failing to file reports of blocked assets. Between April 2018 and May 2020, Gracetown received 24 payments on behalf of a company ultimately owned by sanctioned Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, despite having received explicit prior notice from OFAC that dealings with Deripaska were prohibited. Gracetown also failed to report blocked assets in its possession and control for over 45 months. OFAC determined that the violations were egregious and were not voluntarily self-disclosed.

Penalty Amount

$7,139,305.00

Enforcement Date

December 4, 2025

Rank in Top Penalties

#47

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
Gracetown, Inc.
Country:
🇺🇸 United States
Industry:
Real Estate
Address:
New York
Penalty amount:
$7,139,305.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$8,906,358.00
Max civil monetary penalty:
$8,906,358.00
Egregious case:
Yes
Voluntary self disclosure:
No
Case:
Penalty Notice
Violation period:
April 2018 to May 2020
Program:
Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations (URSR), 31 C.F.R. §§ 589.201Reporting, Procedures and Penalties Regulations (RPPR), 31 C.F.R. § 501.603(a)-(b)31 C.F.R. part 501 app. A(IV)(B)
Enforcement date:
December 4, 2025

Nature of the Apparent Violations

Gracetown was established in 2006 to manage three luxury real estate properties in New York and Washington, D.C. that Deripaska purchased through various legal vehicles. From 2006 to early 2018, Deripaska was the ultimate beneficial owner of Gracetown; in the months before his designation, a relative and known associate became the ultimate beneficial owner. Throughout all relevant times, Gracetown employed a property manager who managed its bank accounts based on instructions from Russia-based stakeholders.

In 2013, Baufinanz, a British Virgin Islands-based company also owned by Deripaska, entered into a settlement agreement with an unrelated U.S. person over a loan dispute. Under the agreement, Gracetown would receive regular monthly payments from the U.S. person that were due to Baufinanz, accounting for them as a loan from Baufinanz and using the funds to manage the properties. Gracetown's property manager received and deposited the payments beginning December 19, 2013.

On April 6, 2018, OFAC added Deripaska to the SDN List and issued Gracetown a Notification of Blocking via certified mail, received by Gracetown's registered agent on April 10, 2018. The Notification informed Gracetown that Deripaska had been designated, that all of his property and interests in property were blocked, that unauthorized dealings would be unlawful and may result in a monetary penalty, and that Gracetown was obligated to block and report any Deripaska-linked property within 10 business days. Because Deripaska was the ultimate beneficial owner of Baufinanz, all of Baufinanz's property and interests in property became blocked as well.

Despite receiving this Notification, Gracetown continued receiving monthly payments on Baufinanz's behalf until May 2020. At the time of designation, Gracetown already owed Baufinanz $72,500 — a debt that became blocked property requiring reporting upon Deripaska's designation. From April 24, 2018, to May 7, 2020, Gracetown received 24 additional payments totaling $31,250, increasing the accumulated debt to $103,750. Gracetown's new owner, speaking on behalf of both Gracetown and Baufinanz, directed these actions of the Gracetown property manager. Gracetown did not report the blocked property until January 11, 2022 — over 45 months after receiving actual notice — by which time OFAC or another federal government agency had already become aware of the violative conduct.

OFAC determined that each of the 24 payments constitutes a violation of the Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations (URSR), 31 C.F.R. §§ 589.201, and that Gracetown's failure to timely submit a blocking report constitutes a violation of section 603(b) of the Reporting, Procedures and Penalties Regulations (RPPR), 31 C.F.R. § 501.603(a)-(b); 31 C.F.R. part 501 app. A(IV)(B).

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

The statutory maximum civil monetary penalty applicable in this matter is $8,906,358, comprising $8,835,264 with respect to the URSR violations and $71,094 with respect to the RPPR violations. OFAC determined that Gracetown did not voluntarily self-disclose the violations and that the violations constitute an egregious case. Accordingly, under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 CFR part 501, app. A, the base civil monetary penalty equals the statutory maximum of $8,906,358. The final penalty of $7,139,305 reflects OFAC's consideration of the General Factors under the Enforcement Guidelines.

Aggravating Factors

  • Gracetown willfully, or, at a minimum, recklessly, violated U.S. sanctions from April 2018 to May 2020, when it continued to receive monthly payments due to Baufinanz while knowing that Deripaska, a blocked person, owned Baufinanz, and after receiving an actual notice from OFAC that dealings involving Deripaska were prohibited.
  • Gracetown was aware that it continued to receive, process, and account for monthly transactions due to Baufinanz after OFAC notified Gracetown of Deripaska's designation on April 6, 2018. The same Gracetown property manager, who also served as Baufinanz's point of contact at Gracetown, received all subject payments from 2013 to 2020 and implemented the arrangement for Gracetown to use the funds as a loan from Baufinanz. Gracetown's new owner, speaking on behalf of both Gracetown and Baufinanz, directed these actions of the Gracetown property manager.
  • Gracetown acted contrary to U.S. sanctions objectives when it continued to fulfill its arrangement with Baufinanz, which became a blocked entity after Deripaska's designation. Gracetown's conduct benefited Deripaska by collecting and securing a debt on Baufinanz's behalf.
  • Gracetown's remedial response was deficient. Considering Gracetown's close relationship with Baufinanz through common management and Deripaska's joint ownership until 2018, and despite receiving actual prior notice from OFAC upon Deripaska's designation in 2018 which reminded Gracetown of its compliance obligations, Gracetown continued its unauthorized dealings and failed to report blocked property in its possession or control for over 45 months.

Mitigating Factors

  • Gracetown signed a Tolling Agreement with OFAC and provided additional information to the agency.
  • Gracetown has not received a Penalty Notice or Finding of Violation from OFAC in the five years preceding the earliest date of the transactions giving rise to the violations. Nonetheless, given the totality of the circumstances in this case, OFAC has determined that no additional reduction in penalty was warranted.

Compliance Takeaways

Entities formerly owned by a blocked person or that otherwise continue to work closely within the network of a blocked person are taking substantial risk in doing so. This enforcement action highlights the importance of closely monitoring and following OFAC-issued guidance, particularly when a U.S. person receives notice due to its close relationship to a sanctioned individual, as violations of U.S. sanctions can result in substantial monetary penalties.

This action also highlights that all U.S. persons are subject to certain reporting requirements involving blocked property and rejected transactions through the OFAC Reporting System. OFAC regulations define the terms "property" and "property interest" to include, among others, assets, funds, indebtedness, contracts of any nature, or interest therein, present, future, or contingent. OFAC requires the timely reporting of blocked property to avoid sanctions violations and late reporting penalties.

OFAC encourages anyone who may have violated any OFAC-administered sanctions programs or is aware of potential violations to disclose the apparent or potential violation to OFAC promptly. Voluntarily self-disclosing apparent violations to OFAC will result in a reduction in the base amount of any proposed civil penalty.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: 6afd59648bbf03f444270f72762fec651a60c8f9c4f69ebe9d1f989cecb99ae8

More OFAC Cases