SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. OFAC Settlement: $5.3M (2018)

Last updated:

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. settled its potential civil liability for apparent violations of multiple sanctions programs, agreeing to remit $5,263,171. The apparent violations involved the processing of 87 net settlement payments with a total value of $1,022,408,149, of which approximately $1,500,000 (0.14%) appears to have been attributable to interests of sanctions-targeted parties, in apparent violation of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 515; the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 560; and the Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 544.

Penalty Amount

$5,263,171.00

Enforcement Date

October 5, 2018

Rank in Top Penalties

#54

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Country:
🇺🇸 United States
Industry:
Banking
Penalty amount:
$5,263,171.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$7,797,290.00
Egregious case:
No
Apparent violations:
87
Voluntary self disclosure:
Yes
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
January 3, 2008 to February 8, 2012
Program:
Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 515 (CACR)Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 560 (ITSR)Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 544 (WMDPSR)
Enforcement date:
October 5, 2018

Nature of the Apparent Violations

JPMC operated a net settlement mechanism that resolved billings by and among various airlines and other participants in the airline industry on behalf of its client, a U.S. entity and its approximately 100 members, and a non-U.S. entity and its over 350 members. Between approximately January 3, 2008 and February 8, 2012, JPMC processed 87 transactions through the U.S. financial system that may have contained interests attributable to a sanctions-targeted party. Each transaction represented a net settlement payment between JPMC's client and the non-U.S. person entity, whose members included eight airlines that were at various times on OFAC's List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons, blocked pursuant to OFAC sanctions, or located in countries subject to sanctions programs administered by OFAC. The 87 net settlement payments had a total value of $1,022,408,149, of which approximately $1,500,000 (0.14%) appears to have been attributable to interests of sanctions-targeted parties. The apparent violations do not include transactions exempt from the prohibitions of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA); they include non-exempt transactions such as airline freight charges.

JPMC did not have, prior to January 2012, a process to independently evaluate the participating member entities of the non-U.S. person entity for OFAC sanctions risk, despite receiving red flag notifications regarding OFAC-sanctioned members on at least three occasions. As a result, for a number of years prior to February 2012, JPMC processed net settlement payments that appear to have violated the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 515 (CACR); the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 560 (ITSR); and the Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 544 (WMDPSR).

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

OFAC determined that JPMC voluntarily self-disclosed the apparent violations and that the apparent violations constitute a non-egregious case. The total base penalty amount for the apparent violations is $7,797,290. The settlement amount of $5,263,171 reflects OFAC's consideration of the facts and circumstances pursuant to the General Factors Affecting Administrative Action under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A.

Aggravating Factors

  • JPMC appears to have acted with reckless disregard for its sanctions compliance obligations when, in its capacity as a clearing bank in a net settlement mechanism, the bank failed to screen participating member entities of the non-U.S. person entity that participated in the net settlement mechanism with JPMC's clients for purposes of OFAC compliance, despite being in possession of the necessary information to enable screening
  • JPMC engaged in a pattern of conduct throughout the relevant period during which JPMC missed red flags and other warning signs on several occasions, including two separate occasions in 2011 when the bank received express notification from its client regarding OFAC-sanctioned entities participating in the settlement mechanism
  • The bank was aware that it processed net settlement transactions on behalf of the two member organizations on a weekly basis, and, given the bank's involvement in reconciling the organizations' billings against each other, JPMC staff members had actual knowledge of the individual members, including OFAC-sanctioned entities, involved in each transaction
  • JPMC's activity conveyed economic benefit to several entities subject to OFAC sanctions and harmed the integrity of a number of OFAC sanctions programs; and JPMC is a large and commercially sophisticated financial institution

Mitigating Factors

  • No JPMC managers or supervisors appear to have been aware of the conduct or transactions that led to the apparent violations
  • The total harm caused to OFAC sanctions programs was significantly less than the total value of the transactions because the transactions represented net settlements between numerous parties, of which the sanctioned entities were only a few
  • JPMC cooperated with OFAC's investigation of the apparent violations, including by entering into a retroactive tolling agreement (and multiple extensions thereof) to toll the statute of limitations
  • JPMC has taken the following steps as part of a risk-based sanctions compliance program to prevent similar apparent violations in the future: between February 2012 and the termination of JPMC's relationship with its U.S. entity client, JPMC screened all net settlement participants in order to prevent sanctioned entities from utilizing the net settlement process; JPMC has increased its compliance staff; JPMC has implemented new sanctions-screening software; and JPMC has enhanced employee training and has previously used these apparent violations as a case study for training purposes

Compliance Takeaways

This enforcement action highlights the risks associated with a U.S. person failing to take adequate steps to ensure that transactions that it processes are compliant with U.S. economic sanctions laws, particularly in instances in which a U.S. person has actual knowledge or reason to know, prior to the transaction being effected, of an SDN's past, present, or future interest in such a transaction.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: d7eaaa11270438653ba2200599b1d2029ea741c7a67390d22d4ca573982f0091

More OFAC Cases