Data last synced:
Last updated:
BD White Birch Investment LLC ("White Birch USA") settled its potential civil liability for three apparent violations of the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 538, agreeing to pay $372,465. The apparent violations involved White Birch USA's facilitation of the sale and shipment of Canadian-origin paper from Canada to Sudan.
Penalty Amount
$372,465.00
Enforcement Date
October 5, 2017
Rank in Top Penalties
#160
White Birch USA appears to have violated ยงยง 538.205 and 538.206 of the SSR when it facilitated the sale and shipment of 543.952 metric tons of Canadian-origin paper from Canada to Sudan with a value of $354,602.26. The export transactions occurred in April and December 2013 and gave rise to three apparent violations. Various personnel within White Birch USA and its Canadian subsidiary, White Birch Paper Canada Company NSULC ("White Birch Canada"), were actively involved in discussing, arranging, and executing the export transactions to Sudan.
OFAC determined that White Birch USA did not voluntarily disclose the apparent violations to OFAC, and that the apparent violations constitute a non-egregious case. The statutory maximum civil monetary penalty amount for the apparent violations was $853,746, and the base civil monetary penalty amount was $445,000. White Birch USA agreed to pay $372,465 to settle its potential civil liability, reflecting OFAC's consideration of the facts and circumstances pursuant to the General Factors under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A.
This enforcement action reinforces certain compliance obligations for U.S. persons, including U.S. parent corporations that maintain subsidiaries located outside of the United States, as well as their U.S. person employees. Unless authorized by OFAC or otherwise exempt by statute, foreign subsidiaries of U.S. parent corporations must act independently from their parent corporations and any other U.S. person with respect to all transactions and activities that would be prohibited if the transactions were engaged in by a U.S. person or in the United States. In addition, any persons who submit information to OFAC regarding potential violations should take steps to ensure that such information is both accurate and complete.
This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.
Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.
Archived on June 13, 2026
SHA-256: f62757ea1796145bacc5cb8e4693e83e87311bb365075a61ee99f5d070a8c258