SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

ZAG IP, LLC OFAC Settlement: $506.2K (2019)

Last updated:

ZAG IP, LLC (formerly known as ZAG International, LLC), a U.S. company, settled its potential civil liability for five apparent violations of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 560, agreeing to pay $506,250. The apparent violations arose from ZAG's purchase of Iranian-origin clinker from a company located in the United Arab Emirates, with knowledge that the cement clinker was sourced from Iran, and its subsequent resale and transportation to a company in Tanzania.

Penalty Amount

$506,250.00

Enforcement Date

February 21, 2019

Rank in Top Penalties

#137

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
ZAG IP, LLC
Country:
🇺🇸 United States
Industry:
Trading
Address:
Newtown, Connecticut
Penalty amount:
$506,250.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$625,000.00
Max civil monetary penalty:
$28,991,922.00
Egregious case:
No
Apparent violations:
5
Voluntary self disclosure:
Yes
Case:
Settlement
Violation period:
July 11, 2014 to January 15, 2015
Program:
Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 560 (ITSR)
Enforcement date:
February 21, 2019

Nature of the Apparent Violations

ZAG's business during the relevant period focused on global sourcing and marketing of cement raw materials and providing strategic advisory services related to raw material selection for companies in the construction industry. On April 11, 2014, ZAG signed a supply contract with a company based in Tanzania (the "Purchaser") and agreed to supply approximately 400,000 metric tons of cement clinker manufactured by a company based in India (the "Supplier"). Under the terms of the contract, ZAG was required to supply the Purchaser with a minimum of three shipments in 2014 and a minimum of five shipments in 2015, approximately 50,000 metric tons per shipment.

On or about June 26, 2014, the Supplier notified ZAG's Managing Director of the Asia Pacific, Middle East, and East Africa Regions ("ZAG Managing Director") that, due to a technical problem at its production plant, it would not have sufficient cement clinker to load onto ZAG's vessel on or about July 5, 2014. ZAG attempted to reschedule the date of its first shipment to the Purchaser but was unable to do so after the Purchaser objected to any delays and threatened to cancel the entire contract. The ZAG Managing Director subsequently identified a business contact and trading company located in the United Arab Emirates (the "Alternative Supplier") capable of providing alternative Iranian-origin cement clinker. Relying on the Alternative Supplier's misrepresentation that the cement clinker was not subject to U.S. economic sanctions on Iran, ZAG purchased the alternative cement clinker from the Alternative Supplier despite its knowledge that the goods were produced by an Iranian manufacturer and shipped from a port in Iran. Through five separate transactions between on or about July 11, 2014 and on or about January 15, 2015, ZAG purchased a total of 263,563 metric tons of Iranian-origin clinker from the Alternative Supplier and resold and transported it to the Purchaser, with an aggregate transaction value of $14,495,961.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

OFAC determined that ZAG voluntarily self-disclosed the apparent violations, and that the apparent violations constitute a non-egregious case. The statutory maximum civil monetary penalty amount for the apparent violations was $28,991,922, and the base civil monetary penalty amount was $625,000. The settlement amount of $506,250 reflects OFAC's consideration of the general factors under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R. part 501, app. A.

Aggravating Factors

  • Although ZAG did exercise limited due diligence, it acted with reckless disregard for sanctions requirements by failing to substantively address the U.S. sanctions prohibitions in place with respect to Iran despite contemporaneous risk indicators
  • ZAG's senior management was aware that ZAG was purchasing and reselling goods of Iranian origin at the time of the conduct at issue
  • The transactions giving rise to the apparent violations conferred significant economic benefits to Iran
  • ZAG is a commercially sophisticated company operating globally with experience and expertise in international transactions
  • ZAG did not have an effective OFAC compliance program in place at the time of the transactions commensurate with its level of risk

Mitigating Factors

  • ZAG has not received a penalty notice or Finding of Violation from OFAC in the five years preceding the date of the transactions giving rise to the apparent violations
  • ZAG was a small business entity as defined by the U.S. Small Business Administration's standards
  • ZAG undertook significant remedial measures by conducting a thorough internal investigation to determine the causes of the compliance failures associated with the apparent violations and enhancing its sanctions compliance policy and procedures, including by developing and implementing a U.S. Export Controls and Economic Compliance Manual and appointing a sanctions compliance officer
  • ZAG cooperated with OFAC's investigation by providing all relevant information regarding the apparent violations in an organized fashion and by responding to OFAC's requests for information in a timely and efficient manner

Compliance Takeaways

This case demonstrates the importance for companies operating in high-risk industries (e.g., international trading) to implement risk-based compliance measures, especially when engaging in transactions involving exposure to jurisdictions or persons implicated by U.S. sanctions. It is essential that companies engaging in international transactions consider and respond to sanctions-related warning signs, such as information that goods originating from, being loaded or unloaded at ports located in, or trans-shipping through, countries or regions subject to comprehensive U.S. economic and trade sanctions.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: c3a7c570ff0c5aa09c4ebba57d5e4a6b99bd7c7264fd4a62bb447fca8fa80a1b

More OFAC Cases