SanctionsLookup

Data last synced:

Grand Resources USA OFAC Civil Penalty: $402K (2012)

Last updated:

Grand Resources USA, Inc. (d/b/a GR-Duratech Texas, Inc.) was assessed a penalty of $402,000 for violating the Iranian Transactions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 560, in 2005 and 2009, and the Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 544, in 2009.

Penalty Amount

$402,000.00

Enforcement Date

August 22, 2012

Rank in Top Penalties

#155

Case Details

Type:
Entity
Name:
Grand Resources USA, Inc. (d/b/a GR-Duratech Texas, Inc.)
Country:
🇺🇸 United States
Industry:
Trading
Address:
Houston, TX
Penalty amount:
$402,000.00
Base civil monetary penalty:
$670,000.00
Egregious case:
Partial
Voluntary self disclosure:
No
Case:
Assessed
Violation period:
2005 to September 2009
Program:
Iranian Transactions Regulations ("ITR"), 31 C.F.R. part 560Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators Sanctions Regulations ("WMDPSR"), 31 C.F.R. part 544
Enforcement date:
August 22, 2012

Nature of the Apparent Violations

In 2005, GR-Duratech negotiated a sale of graphitized petroleum coke to a company in the United Arab Emirates, with knowledge that the goods were for delivery to Bandar Abbas, Iran. After negotiating the terms of the sale and the related letter of credit, GR-Duratech referred the sale to its parent company, Grand Resources Co., Ltd. ("Grand Resources"), in Beijing, China, and later received a commission payment from Grand Resources for the sale.

From July 2009 to August 2009, GR-Duratech dealt in property in which the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines ("IRISL") had an interest, and engaged in transactions or dealings in or related to services of Iranian origin, when GR-Duratech was involved in the shipment of cargo aboard the blocked vessel "Sabalan," a vessel in which IRISL had an interest, and presented trade documents related to the shipment to its bank for payment pursuant to a letter of credit referencing the blocked vessel. GR-Duratech also engaged in transactions that resulted in the removal of references to Iran and an Iranian entity from the trade documents associated with the shipment. In September 2009, GR-Duratech dealt in property in which IRISL had an interest by transferring the trade documents related to the shipment to its customer in Turkey without OFAC's authorization.

How OFAC Determined the Penalty

GR-Duratech did not voluntarily self-disclose the violations to OFAC. OFAC concluded that the 2005 ITR violation was a non-egregious case, but that the 2009 violations of the ITR and WMDPSR were an egregious case, in light of the company's willful concealment and evasion involving GR-Duratech's senior-level management. The base penalty amount for the violations totaled $670,000.

The assessed penalty of $402,000 reflects OFAC's consideration of the following facts and circumstances pursuant to the General Factors under OFAC's Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines, 31 C.F.R., part 501, App. A: GR-Duratech demonstrated reckless disregard for sanctions regulations at the time of the 2005 ITR violation; GR-Duratech knew, prior to the conduct leading to the 2009 violations, that dealings with Iran were prohibited; GR-Duratech willfully attempted to evade U.S. sanctions laws in 2009 by concealing the transactions' relationship to Iran in documents that GR-Duratech presented for payment; senior-level management had knowledge of the conduct that gave rise to the violations in 2009; GR-Duratech cooperated with OFAC's investigation, including by agreeing to toll the statute of limitations; and GR-Duratech has not been the subject of an OFAC enforcement action in the five years preceding the transactions at issue.

Official Source Documents

This page summarizes an OFAC enforcement case based on the document archived below. SanctionsLookup assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the original documents, this summary, or any changes made to the source documents at any time.

Provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Always consult the source document directly rather than relying on this summary.

Archived on June 13, 2026

SHA-256: c7ea4cda65c3733a0c229941a76aea34ee72002cc1f268e9e198e47ad0e3d1ee

More OFAC Cases